startup-tips
Sign in
OpenR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Resilient Integrated Photonic Transport In Denied Environments (RIPTIDE)

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — SOCOM(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.10.21
D-14
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic SOC26BZ06-DV006 · Solicitation 26.BZ

Future autonomous operations will occur in contested electromagnetic environments where traditional positioning, navigation, and timing (PNT) references cannot be assumed. Radio frequency (RF) emissions are inherently detectable, direction-findable, and susceptible to interference and spoofing. These properties are extensively characterized in the open engineering and civil aviation safety literature. Distributed autonomous systems still need to execute coordinated maneuver, distributed sensing, collaborative targeting, long-range autonomy, and mesh-networked operations under these conditions. Inertial navigation accumulates drift over long-duration sorties. RF cooperative navigation can be detected and jammed. Existing free-space optical terminals often exceed Group three (3) UAS size, weight, and power (SWaP) constraints. The needed capability is an ad hoc PNT network, or distributed navigation transport layer, in which the optical mesh serves simultaneously as a data transport layer and as a distributed navigation sensor. Each photonic inter-UAS crosslink provides high-capacity coherent optical communications, two-way precision time transfer, precision optical direction finding, and ranging. Adjacent nodes exchange state vectors, time-transfer references, optical angle measurements, range measurements, and navigation corrections, and a distributed estimator fuses these optical measurements with local inertial data to constrain relative geometry and suppress drift. Anchor nodes operating within visual navigation range of land provide absolute position, bearing, and time references, and these references propagate hop by hop through an optical relay chain to nodes operating over featureless open water. The required capability is defined at the scale of the full swarm, with the formation-level requirement taking precedence over any single link. The swarm shall maintain a navigation accuracy of eight (8) to eleven (11) meters circular error probable (CEP), or better, at the most distant node of a distributed formation spanning two hundred (200) to three hundred (300) nautical miles over feature-sparse terrain, with the formation anchored to land-based references at one end and extending beyond visual navigation range at the other. A representative relay geometry uses approximately eight (8) to twelve (12) optical hops with per-hop ranges of twenty (20) to thirty (30) nautical miles. Proposers may trade hop count against per-hop range, provided the architecture closes the full formation span and meets the formation-level CEP requirement. The architecture shall maintain a shared, formation-wide navigation solution across all nodes in the chain, shall bound error growth across successive hops such that accumulated drift at the seaward edge of the formation remains within the formation-level accuracy requirement stated above, and shall preserve formation coherence under the loss of individual nodes or links within the chain. Candidate payload architectures should provide broad angular coverage within Group three (3) UAS SWaP constraints, including multi-sector optical apertures combining wide-field acquisition sensing (tens of microradians of precision after approximately 1 second of integration) with high-bandwidth photonic beam steering and coherent detection for navigation-grade closed-loop tracking (sub-microradian angular resolution in less than 1 millisecond). As a part of this feasibility study, the proposers shall address all viable overall system design options with respective specifications on the key system attributes, including link budget and range, acquisition and tracking precision, time-transfer accuracy, ranging accuracy, distributed estimation architecture, payload SWaP, and robustness to atmospheric attenuation, atmospheric ducting, turbulence, link interruption, and node loss.

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.10.07
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.10.07
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 2h ago — 최초 수집 (298c4681)