startup-tips
Sign in
UpcomingR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Mobile Vehicle Forensics

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — NAVY(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2027.01.06
D-61
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DON27BZ02-NV006 · Solicitation 27.BZ

Operational Need & Gap: During tactical site exploitation (TSE), Marine Corps and Joint operators require immediate, field-deployable hardware and software to recognize, preserve, and collect materials of forensic value. While multi-purpose forensic kits exist to process traditional materials, a critical intelligence gap remains regarding vehicle-derived data. Modern vehicles function as mobile data hubs featuring advanced navigation, localized track logs, and cached external device connections. Exploiting this telematics and informatics data is vital for generating actionable intelligence, mapping networks, and establishing identity dominance. The Problem (Technological Fragmentation): The primary barrier to tactical vehicle exploitation is severe technological fragmentation. Current vehicle forensic solutions are often designed for controlled laboratory environments. Because In-Vehicle Infotainment (IVI) systems and Electronic Control Units (ECUs) rely on proprietary software architectures and inconsistent file structures, existing tools are often restricted to narrow manufacturer subsets. Consequently, field operators may be forced to perform invasive, time-consuming physical disassembly of the vehicle dashboard—a method that is untenable in many field environments. Scope of Effort: This SBIR topic seeks innovative proposals to develop a low-SWaP (Size, Weight, and Power), ruggedized, all-in-one device that automates the forensic exploitation of vehicle data systems. The system must interface via standard external access points (e.g., On-Board Diagnostic [OBD-II] ports or Universal Serial Bus [USB]); automatically profile the vehicle’s make, model, year, and digital architecture; and execute an automated script to extract and structure data. Crucially, these features must be achieved through a non-invasive approach requiring no component disassembly, while maintaining strict forensic data integrity and verifiable accuracy. The system must seamlessly interface with a broad registry of modern commercial and civilian vehicles across diverse model years, makes, and international manufacturers. Specifically, the device must extract and normalize data from disparate telematics systems (e.g., embedded GPS, localized track logs) and informatics modules (e.g., infotainment systems, paired Bluetooth logs, Wi-Fi cache, and cellular device pairings) without requiring laboratory-grade component disassembly. Performance Goals: • Threshold (Minimum): Demonstrate compatibility with representative samples of common vehicles; extract high-priority telematics (i.e., GPS, route history) and informatics (paired device logs) in under 15 minutes with verifiable accuracy (i.e., comparison with test data collected separately); packaged in a portable, field-ruggedized kit. • Objective (Ideal): A pocket-sized, plug-and-play device that requires minimal operator training; demonstrates a modular path to broad vehicle compatibility; and extracts a comprehensive forensic data set in under 5 minutes via an intuitive, automated interface.

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.11.06
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.11.06
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Sources (3)
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (7a1fa443)