Intelligent Tools for Naval Aircrew Performance and Readiness
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DON26BZ05-NV068 · Solicitation 26.BZ
Modern Naval Aviation operations place significant cognitive, physical, and psychological demands on aircrew tasked with operating sophisticated, highly integrated aircraft. While advanced training simulations exist, they often rely on static assessments or subjective observations, lacking the dynamic, predictive, and personalized capabilities needed to optimize aircrew readiness, prevent human factors-related issues, and mitigate physical and psychological injuries. Challenges such as cognitive overload, spatial disorientation, cognitive tunneling, fatigue, musculoskeletal injuries from prolonged vibration, and burnout—highlighted by recent research on helicopter aircrew—pose significant risks to mission success and safety, particularly in contested or degraded environments. This topic seeks to develop an intelligent human performance system as a critical prehabilitation and protection tool, designed to augment and empower aeromedical officers in proactively managing aircrew readiness and well-being. The system will move beyond reactive responses to support aeromedical officers in optimizing aircrew performance through the following capabilities: 1. Proactive Performance Monitoring and Prediction: Leverage intelligent tools to continuously assess aircrew cognitive state, physical performance, and psychological response using physiological sensors, eye-tracking, performance metrics, voice analysis, and validated self-reported measures (e.g., Military Readiness Scale - MRS-15). Predict potential vulnerabilities based on historical data and real-time inputs, providing actionable insights for aeromedical officers to inform interventions. 2. Personalized Insights and Recommendations: Provide data-driven insights tailored to individual strengths, weaknesses, and predicted vulnerabilities. Aeromedical officers can use these insights to recommend personalized training protocols, prehabilitation exercises, cognitive conditioning, physical readiness programs, and psychological resilience strategies to mitigate fatigue, injury risk, and stress. 3. Human-System Vulnerability Identification: Analyze interactions between aircrew and aircraft systems to identify human-system interface shortcomings or cognitive biases under specific conditions. This data will enable aeromedical officers to recommend improvements in aircraft design, cockpit ergonomics, and aircrew training methodologies, addressing readiness gaps and supporting proactive mitigations. 4. Trust Calibration through Data Transparency: Provide transparent, objective data on aircrew performance and automated system behavior to foster appropriate levels of trust. Aeromedical officers can guide aircrew on when and how to rely on automation, preventing over-reliance or under-utilization, thereby enhancing operational safety and efficiency. 5. Building Resilience and Sustaining Readiness: Utilize continuous feedback and predictive analytics to support mental fortitude, adaptability, and decision-making in high-stakes situations. The system will actively contribute to long-term aircrew readiness and operational lifespan under the guidance of aeromedical support teams. Proposed solutions should focus on fundamental research into innovative tools for intelligent human performance monitoring and prediction, along with methods for rigorously evaluating their impact on aircrew cognitive function, physical responses, psychological state, and mission performance. Emphasis should be placed on a human-centric approach, ensuring actionable insights, alignment with aeromedical and clinical practice guidelines, and measurable, sustainable improvements in aircrew readiness as part of a comprehensive program.
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- Needs verification
- Technology
- Needs verification
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules
Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure
Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties
Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits
How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it
- 18Local entity required
You cannot apply without an entity registered in that country.
- 16Overseas applicants not eligible
Only domestically registered companies may apply.
- 10Own contribution not stated· evidence needs verification
R&D and pilot programmes commonly require one. Confirm the ratio.
- 10Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification
The list of required documents was not collected.
- 8Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification
Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.
- 7Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification
Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.
- 6Award size not stated· evidence needs verification
The announcement does not state how much is available.
- 6Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification
Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.
- · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
- · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
- · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
- · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
- · The required own-contribution ratio is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
- · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
- · The award size is not stated (needs verification).
- · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).
Generated by local:rules-v1 · 3h ago
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is U.S. Department of War — NAVY. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.
- NDA
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Data rights
- Needs verification
- Disclosure depth
- Needs verification
- File patent first?
- Not applicable
- Reuse of submissions
- Needs verification
- Publicity obligation
- Needs verification
- Exposure score
- Needs verification
- · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
- · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
- · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
- · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
- · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
- · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
- · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
- · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
- · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
- · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
- · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
- HIGHPoC/공동개발 IP 귀속 조항 확인
공동개발 산출물의 지분·개선발명(improvement) 귀속·배경지식(background IP) 분리 조항을 협약서에서 확인하십시오.
- MEDIUMRequest an NDA
Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.
4 evidence item(s) from the source
- UNKNOWN
No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.
Source link - UNKNOWN
No NDA clause could be found.
Source link - UNKNOWN
IP ownership terms could not be found.
Source link - UNKNOWN
Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.
Source link
- · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
- · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
- · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
- · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 3h ago
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- − 현지 법인 설립이 필요합니다.
- − 해외 기업은 지원할 수 없습니다.
- ! IP 귀속 조항이 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
- ! 중복 수혜 제한 규정을 사전에 확인하십시오.
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- DIRECT TO PHASE II: Intelligent Data Analysis of Post-Mission Reporting Artifacts & Data
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-34 - Automated Post-Mission De-Brief and Re-Planning for Collaborative Combat Aircraft (CCA) Missions
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-34 - Lightweight, Modular Fuel Cell Systems for Unmanned Aircraft Systems
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-34 - Multi-Frequency Coverage Unit with Broad Band Interference and Designed Canceller
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-34 - Compact Efficient High Energy Pulsed Laser
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-34
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.08.20
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.08.20
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- local:rules-v1 · 3h ago
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 2h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 2h ago
- · 3h ago — 변경 감지되어 갱신 (887952ce)
- · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (e91c459d)