ICU-in-a-Box: Autonomous Extracorporeal Multiple-Organ Support Therapies
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DPA26BZ06-DV029 · Solicitation 26.BZ
Severe hemorrhage is the number one cause of preventable combat deaths, followed by airway compromise (Eastridge, 2012), with increased artillery, thermobaric and incendiary munitions use (Remondelli et al. 2023) potentially increasing lung injury prevalence in future conflicts. Following initial trauma, sepsis and multiple-organ failure predominate (Neff et al. 2013). While improvements in point of injury care (tourniquets, hemostatic dressings, etc.) have significantly increased survival in early trauma phases (Chovanes et al, 2012, Cohen et al., 2012), such care is ideally followed by pre-hospital care from trained medical providers during casualty evacuation. However, as reflected by the large-scale combat operations (LSCO) in the Russia-Ukraine war and with Special Operations missions in remote, austere locations, access to definitive medical care may not be available for days, especially in conflict with near-peer adversaries (Keenan and Riesberg, 2017; Remondelli et al. 2023; Epstein et al., 2023).More people surviving early phases of trauma combined with decreased evacuation opportunities highlights a pressing need for solutions that can provide advanced and sustained resuscitative care for the organ failure sequalae of severe trauma (e.g., hypotension, respiratory failure, acute renal failure). A growing body of technical capabilities and supporting literature suggests that by focusing on the key drivers of mortality, advances in autonomous systems across several areas of critical care could be combined into a single "ICU-in-a-Box". In particular, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an alternative to using intubation and mechanical ventilation (under deep sedation) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (Geetha 2024). Because an ECMO system is essentially just a pump and a membrane lung, it offers a strong opportunity to automate oxygenation support—along with other key combat casualty care needs. While current ECMO systems require highly trained operators, largely because of the need to insert large cannulas and the associated thrombotic risks, recent advances can mitigate these limitations. For example, assistive insertion devices (Brattain 2021) and ECMO systems with smaller cannulas (Osmani et al., 2026) reduce the difficulty of insertion; antithrombotic coatings, portable systems (Szentgyorgyi 2025), and alternatives to conventional membrane oxygenators (Conrad 1994) reduce thrombotic risk (at least over shorter periods); and AI/ML advances in general as well as ECMO management computer models (Pladet 2023, Geetha 2024) could support automation. Once venous access is established for automated ECMO, it enables additional interventions. For example, automated algorithms have stabilized mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate for short periods following severe hemorrhage in porcine models (Pinsky 2024); renal replacement therapy (RRT) could mitigate life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities; and extracorporeal blood purification techniques could remove inflammatory mediators, infectious agents, or toxins (Neff 2013).This SBIR seeks to combine such capabilities into a single, portable, integrated intervention and delivery platform for resuscitation, cardiovascular and lung support. There is additional potential to automate sedation (Daga 2026, Nagata 2023), analgesia (Aissou 2012), and renal replacement therapies (Wieringa 2025). Although these efforts remain relatively immature, their addition to the integrated system could further extend ICU-level, autonomous extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in the austere and operational setting.
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- Mobility
- Technology
- Needs verification
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
No IP assessment yet.
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- Needs verification
- Nothing flagged
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- Autonomous On Orbit Logistics and Sustainment Architecture
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — USAF
Needs verificationD-14 - Ground and Air Launched Drone Swarms Create a Self-Protecting Perimeter Using Autonomous AI
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — USAF
Needs verificationD-14 - Mobility
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · National Science Foundation
Needs verificationD-273 - Autonomous Systems and Economies, and Smart Contracts
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · National Science Foundation
Needs verificationD-273 - Other Mobility Topics
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · National Science Foundation
Needs verificationD-273
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.10.07
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.10.07
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- Needs verification
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 2h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 2h ago
- · 2h ago — 최초 수집 (65ee2cc0)