startup-tips
Sign in
OpenR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

ICU-in-a-Box: Autonomous Extracorporeal Multiple-Organ Support Therapies

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — DARPA(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.10.21
D-14
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DPA26BZ06-DV029 · Solicitation 26.BZ

Severe hemorrhage is the number one cause of preventable combat deaths, followed by airway compromise (Eastridge, 2012), with increased artillery, thermobaric and incendiary munitions use (Remondelli et al. 2023) potentially increasing lung injury prevalence in future conflicts. Following initial trauma, sepsis and multiple-organ failure predominate (Neff et al. 2013). While improvements in point of injury care (tourniquets, hemostatic dressings, etc.) have significantly increased survival in early trauma phases (Chovanes et al, 2012, Cohen et al., 2012), such care is ideally followed by pre-hospital care from trained medical providers during casualty evacuation. However, as reflected by the large-scale combat operations (LSCO) in the Russia-Ukraine war and with Special Operations missions in remote, austere locations, access to definitive medical care may not be available for days, especially in conflict with near-peer adversaries (Keenan and Riesberg, 2017; Remondelli et al. 2023; Epstein et al., 2023).More people surviving early phases of trauma combined with decreased evacuation opportunities highlights a pressing need for solutions that can provide advanced and sustained resuscitative care for the organ failure sequalae of severe trauma (e.g., hypotension, respiratory failure, acute renal failure). A growing body of technical capabilities and supporting literature suggests that by focusing on the key drivers of mortality, advances in autonomous systems across several areas of critical care could be combined into a single "ICU-in-a-Box". In particular, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an alternative to using intubation and mechanical ventilation (under deep sedation) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (Geetha 2024). Because an ECMO system is essentially just a pump and a membrane lung, it offers a strong opportunity to automate oxygenation support—along with other key combat casualty care needs. While current ECMO systems require highly trained operators, largely because of the need to insert large cannulas and the associated thrombotic risks, recent advances can mitigate these limitations. For example, assistive insertion devices (Brattain 2021) and ECMO systems with smaller cannulas (Osmani et al., 2026) reduce the difficulty of insertion; antithrombotic coatings, portable systems (Szentgyorgyi 2025), and alternatives to conventional membrane oxygenators (Conrad 1994) reduce thrombotic risk (at least over shorter periods); and AI/ML advances in general as well as ECMO management computer models (Pladet 2023, Geetha 2024) could support automation. Once venous access is established for automated ECMO, it enables additional interventions. For example, automated algorithms have stabilized mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate for short periods following severe hemorrhage in porcine models (Pinsky 2024); renal replacement therapy (RRT) could mitigate life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities; and extracorporeal blood purification techniques could remove inflammatory mediators, infectious agents, or toxins (Neff 2013).This SBIR seeks to combine such capabilities into a single, portable, integrated intervention and delivery platform for resuscitation, cardiovascular and lung support. There is additional potential to automate sedation (Daga 2026, Nagata 2023), analgesia (Aissou 2012), and renal replacement therapies (Wieringa 2025). Although these efforts remain relatively immature, their addition to the integrated system could further extend ICU-level, autonomous extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in the austere and operational setting.

Category
R&D
Industry
Mobility
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.10.07
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.10.07
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 2h ago — 최초 수집 (65ee2cc0)