Autonomous On Orbit Logistics and Sustainment Architecture
Overview
30초 안에 판단해야 할 핵심 정보
SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DAF26BX06-DV513 · Solicitation 26.BX
Space systems today are designed for single use and lack the ability to be maintained, repaired, or resupplied once deployed. This design philosophy limits maneuverability, reduces resilience, and forces operators to conserve resources. As maneuver warfare emerges in the space domain, the United States Space Force requires a logistics backbone that provides freedom of action, operational reach, and prolonged endurance. This backbone must support rapid reconstitution, autonomous servicing, multi orbit distribution, and predictive sustainment. The On Orbit Space Logistics Challenge seeks mature technologies that can transition directly into prototype development. These technologies must support a future in which satellites are serviced, refueled, repaired, repositioned, and recovered as part of routine operations. The D2P2 effort will focus on autonomous operations, multi orbit integration, servicing demonstrations, depot interactions, and logistics health monitoring. The performer must demonstrate how their technology contributes to a resilient logistics architecture capable of supporting sustained operations in contested environments. This topic encourages solutions that integrate with broader Space Force concepts such as sustained space maneuver, dynamic space operations, and contested logistics. The performer must show how their technology supports mission continuity, reduces reconstitution burden, and enhances the survivability of critical space assets. Offerors may structure their approach using one of two acceptable architectural frameworks. Both approaches are valid for early exploration and concept development, and both support the broader goal of building a resilient on orbit logistics enterprise. Offerors should select the approach that best aligns with their proposed technology, their integration pathway, and the operational problem they intend to solve. Systems of Systems Approach A Systems of Systems approach views the on orbit logistics enterprise as a collection of interconnected subsystems that work together to deliver sustained combat power. This perspective recognizes that no single technology can solve the logistics challenge alone. Instead, multiple systems must interact across orbital regimes, mission timelines, and operational conditions. Under this approach, the proposer describes how their technology fits within a larger architecture that includes depots, warehouses, orbital transfer vehicles, servicing vehicles, drop ships, and health monitoring systems. The feasibility study should explain how the proposed system interacts with other systems, how it contributes to distribution loops, and how it supports the overall sustainment mission. This approach is well suited for technologies that enable integration, coordination, or interoperability across multiple nodes. A Systems of Systems framing encourages proposers to think about interfaces, standards, autonomy, and mission sequencing. It also supports early identification of dependencies, constraints, and opportunities for modularity. This approach is particularly useful for technologies that enable routing, servicing, depot operations, or multi orbit logistics planning. Logistics Function Approach A Logistics Function approach focuses on the specific logistics activity that the proposed technology enables. Instead of describing the entire architecture, the proposer concentrates on the function their system performs. Examples include refueling, repair, recovery, resupply, warehousing, or health monitoring.Under this approach, the feasibility study explains how the proposed technology improves the performance of a particular logistics function. The proposer describes the operational need, the current limitations, and the functional improvements their solution provides. This approach is well suited for technologies that perform a discrete logistics task, such as propellant transfer, component replacement, autonomous inspection, or orbital resupply. A Logist…
- 카테고리
- R&D
- 산업
- 모빌리티/자동차, 물류
- 기술
- 확인 필요
- 대상 단계
- 확인 필요
- 사업기간
- 확인 필요
- 예상 준비기간
- 확인 필요
Funding
지원 규모와 지급 방식
- 지원금 범위
- 확인 필요
- 통화
- USD
- 총 사업예산
- 확인 필요
- 지원방식
- 확인 필요
- 자부담
- 확인 필요
- Matching Fund
- 확인 필요
- 지급방식
- 확인 필요
- 비고
- -
Eligibility
지원자격 — 우리가 지원 가능한가?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- 설립 연차
- 확인 필요
- 직원수
- 0명 ~ 500명
- 매출 조건
- 확인 필요
- 컨소시엄
- 확인 필요
Location Requirements
지역·법인 조건
- 주 대상 국가
- 🇺🇸 미국
- 추가 적격 국가
- 없음
- 해외기업 지원
- 불가
- 현지 법인
- 필수
- 지역 조건
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
필수/선택 · 발급처 · 난이도 · 유효기간 · 주의사항
제출서류 정보가 수집되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요). 공식 공고문에서 직접 확인하세요.
Application Process
신청 절차
신청 절차 정보가 확인되지 않았습니다.
Evaluation
평가 절차와 기준
평가 절차 정보가 확인되지 않았습니다.
Timeline
공고 → 접수 → 평가 → 협약 → 수행
신청 절차 정보가 확인되지 않았습니다.
Equity & Financial Terms
지분·융자·계약 조건
- 지분 요구
- 확인 필요
- 융자 여부
- 무상 지원
- 중복수혜
- 확인 필요
- IP 귀속
- 확인 필요
- 결과물 소유권
- 확인 필요
- 독점권
- 확인 필요
- 우선협상권
- 확인 필요
- 정산·감사
- 확인 필요
Risk Intelligence
지원해도 괜찮은가? — 5개 축과 종합 점수 (낮을수록 안전)
Risk 분석 결과가 없습니다. Admin에서 재분석을 실행하세요.
IP / Idea Protection
기술과 아이디어를 어디까지 공개해야 하는가
IP 분석 결과가 없습니다.
AI Analysis
장단점 · 난이도 · 경쟁강도 · 매력도
서류·평가 단계 기반
규모·유형 기반 추정치
금액·조건·IP 종합
5개 축 가중 평균
- 확인 필요
- 확인 필요
- 특이사항 없음
Similar Programs
유형·국가·기술이 유사한 사업
- Ground and Air Launched Drone Swarms Create a Self-Protecting Perimeter Using Autonomous AI
🇺🇸 미국 · R&D 과제 · U.S. Department of War — USAF
확인 필요D-14 - Increasing competitiveness and resilience of multimodal freight transport and logistics for competitive supply chains
🇪🇺 EU · R&D 과제 · European Commission
€6.5MD-1 - ICU-in-a-Box: Autonomous Extracorporeal Multiple-Organ Support Therapies
🇺🇸 미국 · R&D 과제 · U.S. Department of War — DARPA
확인 필요D-14 - Mobility
🇺🇸 미국 · R&D 과제 · National Science Foundation
확인 필요D-273 - Other Mobility Topics
🇺🇸 미국 · R&D 과제 · National Science Foundation
확인 필요D-273
Source & Provenance
모든 값은 원본 URL과 수집 시각을 가집니다
- 최종 수집
- 2026.10.07
- 담당자 검수
- 미검수 (공고 원문 확인 권장)
- 최초 수집
- 2026.10.07
- 데이터 상태
- 자동 수집 (미검수)
- AI 보강
- 확인 필요
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
수집: 1시간 전
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
수집: 1시간 전
- · 1시간 전 — 최초 수집 (f8ad0d5c)