DIRECT TO PHASE II: Advanced Multi-User Signal Separation for Tactical Waveforms
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DON27BZ02-DV028 · Solicitation 27.BZ
The Program Office championing this effort is PMW/A 101 that manages and delivers advanced, secure tactical communication systems for naval platforms. A core mandate of this office is to continuously integrate next-generation capabilities that enhance waveform resilience, increase spectral efficiency, and ensure robust connectivity for warfighters operating in highly congested and contested electromagnetic environments. The technology developed under this SBIR Direct to Phase II topic is intended to transition directly into the PMW 101 portfolio of tactical radio systems. In modern tactical networks, the proliferation of friendly assets creates a dense signal environment where simultaneous transmissions on the same frequency cause multi-user collisions and limit operational effectiveness. This problem is exacerbated in contested domains where very low Signal-to-Noise Ratios (SNRs) are common. Current baseline receiver systems typically treat these overlapping friendly signals as insurmountable noise. Because legacy systems lack the ability to untangle these collisions, they simply drop the packets or fail to decode them entirely, which severely limits network throughput and the real-time data exchange required for mission-critical operations. To overcome these limitations and maintain a critical operational advantage, this SBIR Direct to Phase II topic seeks the development of an advanced signal processing core capable of robust multi-user signal separation for tactical waveforms. By enabling non-orthogonal multiple access-like schemes, this capability will significantly increase network capacity and user count without requiring additional spectrum. The goal is to deliver high-quality soft signal likelihoods recovered from simultaneous-user collisions to downstream soft-decision decoding algorithms. To achieve close-to-optimal performance in two-user collisions, proposed approaches must operate effectively at very low SNRs and mitigate intermittent interference by dynamically detecting burst collisions and nullifying compromised likelihood data. While advanced joint demodulation represents one viable pathway, proposers are highly encouraged to suggest any innovative framework that targets an approximate 3dB improvement over current baselines. The targeted improvement will be measured against the current baseline receiver under comparable two-user collision conditions and will reflect improvement in multi-user separation and downstream decoding performance rather than overall receiver sensitivity. This 3dB gain will translate directly to longer communication ranges, higher data rates, and increased resilience against jamming. This effort requires the performer to: Develop an advanced algorithm for multi-user separation that is effective in low SNR and interference-prone environments. Generate high-quality Log-Likelihood Ratios (LLRs) for modern soft-decision forward error correction (FEC) decoders, utilizing novel, proposer-defined technical approaches. Implement a mechanism to detect burst collisions and erase or correct corrupted likelihood data to prevent decoder failure. Design, implement, and test the algorithm within a modular Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) core based on open-systems principles. The successful transition of this capability will fundamentally improve the resilience of tactical networks. By delivering a modular FPGA core built on open-systems principles, the solution could be seamlessly integrated into a wide range of current and future Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) radio platforms, which could significantly reduce the life-cycle costs associated with developing entirely new systems to achieve these capabilities. This Direct to Phase II effort seeks proposers who can rapidly demonstrate these advanced receiver techniques with a clear transition path into operational military hardware. Work produced in Phase II may become classified. Note: The prospective contractor(s) must be U.S. owned and o…
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- Needs verification
- Technology
- Needs verification
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
No IP assessment yet.
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- Needs verification
- Nothing flagged
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- Cleaner for the Time Domain Reflectometer Tank Level Indicator
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-19 - Fire Resistant Joiner Bulkhead
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-19 - Intermediate Temperature Cooling Unit
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-19 - ONR Open Topic for Low-Cost Heads Up Displays (HUDs) for Virtual & Augmented Reality (VR/AR)
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-19 - Input-Output Unit (IOU) for Secure Processing and Routing of Hull, Mechanical, & Electrical (HM&E) and Navigation Signals
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — NAVY
Needs verificationD-19
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.11.06
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.11.06
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- Needs verification
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 4h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 4h ago
- · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (f2730438)