startup-tips
Sign in
OpenR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Bio-inspired Underwater Teams

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — OSD(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.10.21
D-6
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

STTR · Phase: BOTH · Topic OSW26TZ06-NV008 · Solicitation 26.TZ

Bio-inspired underwater vehicles have nearly matched the speeds and efficiencies of real fish. Now, these platforms are on the cusp of operating as multiagent teams, which would further improve efficiency and unlock novel mission utility. Recent work has shown how the hydrodynamic benefits of schooling can be translated into groups of underwater vehicles. In this STTR, the use of physical models and 3D simulations of sufficient fidelity are expected to enable exploration and understanding of the effects of controlled variation of key parameters such as geometric positioning with respect to other wakes and body deformation in developing protype underwater teams. Recent progress in this area, combined with the wide availability of 3D physical and computational methods, presents a significant, new opportunity for the application of fundamental knowledge to exploit the hydrodynamic benefits that result from schooling fish. This STTR Topic will pursue the design and demonstration of innovative, bio-inspired UUV teams with capabilities well beyond the state of the art for range, endurance, speed and quietness. The overall design objective and targeted capabilities apply to a group of untethered UUVs, each between 1-5 meters in length, and capable of operating in salt water to depths of 50 ft, to support Phase II and Phase III testing. Conventional designs and propulsors (such as propellers and jets) are not in scope for this topic. The design will be evaluated according to measurable performance criteria: – Speed: minimum 4 meters/sec, with an objective of 6 meters/sec or higher; Cost of Transport (COT): proposed project should optimize the COT and demonstrate clear improvement over the state-of-the-art, for the chosen vehicle length and speed; Quietness: underwater acoustic energy generated by the vehicles, should be minimized by design; Power: the design shall not rely on energy harvesting from the environment but can incorporate methods of energy recovery from mechanical motion itself. It shall utilize state-of-the-art energy storage (R&D into energy storage is outside the scope of this topic); Power Transmission: the design shall use state-of-the-art means of transferring power to the propulsor. Successful proposals will explain how the proposed means of power transmission will contribute to meeting the performance objectives; Sensing and control: approaches to sensing and dynamic control that optimize hydrodynamic interactions and flow physics are in-scope for this Topic. The successful proposal will explain how these will contribute to meeting the performance objectives; Path Planning: use off-the-shelf components to provide sufficient capability for the platforms to perform the demonstrations during Phase II and Phase III, including straight line tracks and simple maneuvers sufficient to demonstrate speed, range, endurance and acoustics. R&D into path planning is outside the scope of this topic; Vehicle cost: estimated cost of scaled manufacturing is a factor in the proposal evaluations and can be used to guide material and design selection. The successful proposal will identify supply chain risks and a mitigation plan.

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.10.14
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.10.14
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (3ea25817)