Agentic-AI, Schema-Driven Decision Management for Auditable Studies and Acquisition Decisions
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
STTR · Phase: Phase I · Topic ARM26TX06-NV003 · Solicitation 26.TX
This topic will prototype and demonstrate a schema-driven Decision Management (DM) foundation plus a governed agentic AI layer that turns messy decision requests into auditable, signer-ready Decision Packages. The focus is proof by demonstration (not a full product build) to show the approach works for point trade studies and long-horizon acquisition decision programs with traceability, robustness, and human control. AI can process vast amounts of structured and unstructured data from Digital Engineering (DE) ecosystems, including digital threads and digital twins, enabling comprehensive analysis across the entire product lifecycle. Interoperability across models is achieved as AI integrates data from various DE tools (e.g., SysML 2.0, UML, etc.) and provides a unified view of system models, enabling cross-functional teams to collaborate effectively. The first objective is to demonstrate a unified representation that supports both (a) single-episode trade studies and (b) multi-episode "decision programs" with refresh cycles. This includes implementing context engineering specifically for the ground vehicle domain through knowledge graphs and semantic layers that capture domain-specific relationships, constraints, and requirements. The second objective is to implement agentic capabilities that produce structured artifacts and reproducible outputs, while maintaining human control and predictable behavior per established human-AI interaction guidance. AI will automate the validation of technical documents, models, and outputs, ensuring compliance with standards and requirements throughout the decision-making process. The third objective is to extend the schema so bias checks, risks, and assumptions are explicit, testable objects – so decision readiness can be assessed before sign-off and refreshed responsibly when conditions change. The system will leverage semantic understanding to maintain consistency across digital engineering artifacts and enable traceable decision rationale.
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- AI & Data
- Technology
- AI / ML
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
No IP assessment yet.
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- Needs verification
- Nothing flagged
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- Ground and Air Launched Drone Swarms Create a Self-Protecting Perimeter Using Autonomous AI
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — USAF
Needs verificationD-14 - Agentic AI Based Cognitive Radar for GEOINT Mission
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — OSD
Needs verificationD-14 - Influence Benchmarks for AI Systems
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — DARPA
Needs verificationD-14 - AI/ML for Next Generation of Missile Detection, Warning, Tracking, and Reporting
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — USAF
Needs verificationD-14 - Sustainable AI Technologies for Low Resource Environments
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · National Science Foundation
Needs verificationD-273
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.10.07
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.10.07
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- Needs verification
- PRIMARY
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 2h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 2h ago
- · 2h ago — 변경 감지되어 갱신 (407771d2)
- · 2h ago — 최초 수집 (4dde2808)