Validation and Verification of Computational Modeling of Human Blast Injury on Battlefield
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DTR27BZ02-NV004 · Solicitation 27.BZ
Blast events accounted for over 70% of casualties among service members engaged in ground combat events. The energy generated by an explosion can cause devastating physical trauma, affect multiple body systems and result in severe injuries or even fatalities (1.2). Although there has been extensive research into injury mechanisms of blast trauma, including primary overpressure effects, secondary fragmentation wounds, tertiary blunt trauma, and quaternary thermal or chemical injuries, there are no modeling & simulation (M&S) tools currently available which can provide a comprehensive view of the types and severity of injuries in the context of the uncertainties and complexities of realistic battlefield scenarios. Existing injury modeling tools, such as Operational Requirements-based Casualty Assessment model (ORCA) developed by US Army DEVCOM, the INJURY code developed by the Medical Research and Development Command, and the AUDITORY model developed by the Joint Intermediate Force Capabilities Office (JIFCO), each model individual injuries occurring to a single person in the absence of PPE. They are not designed to address multiple, multi-modal injuries that may occur in ground combat, and they model wounds from the “skin in,” rather than accounting for the effects of clothing or PPE. These tools can only be used for research purposes and are not designed to support battlefield operation. In contrast, the Human Injury Prediction (HIP) tool, developed by Defense Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL) of United Kingdom, predicts injuries to multiple people from a terrorist attack. Unfortunately, this tool is limited to modeling the effects of only a single blast event caused by a terrorist weapon detonated in an urban environment. And, again, HIP models isolated injuries and cannot address multiple, multi-modal injuries. Finally, a major challenge of leveraging these tools in DTRA Technical Reachback mission is that injuries are predicted based upon biomechanical effects, and do not address human physiology. This shortcoming becomes particularly critical with multiple injuries, where the human body response to injuries is intact and synergetic among organs/tissues. Apart from the specific challenges of modeling injuries and the associated changes in physiology, a comprehensive battlefield blast injury M&S tool is a multidisciplinary endeavor, requiring expertise in diverse domains, to include medicine, military operations, weaponeering, synthetic population modeling, epidemiology, structures, machine learning, computational modeling, and PPE. ASME V&V 40 serves as the gold standard for computational model credibility in biomedical applications, and DoD Instruction 5000.61 (Modeling and Simulation Verification, Validation, and Accreditation) requires human injury models to be validated before moving to support military operation (3,4,5). The modeling effort should align with the Blast Injury Research Coordinating Office (BIRCO) and the Blast Injury Prevention Standards Recommendation (BIPSR) process. The access to sensitive battle databases must be tightly controlled and limited to need-to-know personnel (6). Based on the regulation and scientific merit, the current request for proposal (RFP) will focus on validation of the on-going approach by using independent groups.
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- Needs verification
- Technology
- Needs verification
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
No IP assessment yet.
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- Needs verification
- Nothing flagged
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- Remote UAS-based X-Ray for Device Assessment in CBRNE Environments
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — DTRA
Needs verificationD-61 - Biolab Mirror: Artificial Intelligence / Machine Learning (AI/ML) Digital Twin for Intent Characterization and Bio-Containment Integrity
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — DTRA
Needs verificationD-61 - UAS-based Precision Aim for Device Render Safe in CBRN Environments
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — DTRA
Needs verificationD-61 - Dynamic Sensor-Tasking and Routing System for Subsurface Hazard Detection
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — DTRA
Needs verificationD-61 - Domestic Fabrication Of High-Purity Precursor Materials For Advanced Radiation Detection Scintillator Crystals
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — DTRA
Needs verificationD-61
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.11.06
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.11.06
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- Needs verification
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 4h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 4h ago
- · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (e6517197)