startup-tips
Sign in
UpcomingR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

UAS-based Precision Aim for Device Render Safe in CBRN Environments

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — DTRA(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2027.01.06
D-61
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DTR27BZ02-NV001 · Solicitation 27.BZ

DTRA is in need of technical innovations associated with warfighting units performing very long range WMD device render-safe missions from a safe distance, outside of potentially CBRN contaminated environments. Explosive Ordinance Disposal (EOD) definitions and terms are commonly used by many nations and exist on the public internet including steps involving EOD detection, identification, field evaluation, render safe, recovery and disposal. Successfully performing stand-off EOD missions with personal positioned away from the contaminated environment requires a payload capable of remotely and accurately aiming via employment of currently fielded EOD disruptors against the explosive ordnance threat with a high degree of precision. Payload capabilities of the proposed solution should ideally be sized to be compatible with currently fielded Department of War UAS systems. The desired end state is a system weight that is designed for small-unit operations UAS. DTRA conducts counter WMD science and technology research and testing efforts for Joint Services EOD missions. Ground robotic platforms currently provide the only fielded remote-employment method for EOD disruptors, but these lack terrain-independent access and approach-angle flexibility that an aerial platform would provide. Small unit operations UAS platforms with sufficient flight endurance and payload capacity to carry current EOD-relevant payloads into contested or austere environments. This topic seeks novel approaches to providing precision remote-aiming payloads delivered and emplaced by remote UAS with subsequent operational render safe execution orchestrated from remotely. The capability should be able to be remotely recovered and re-charged to enable system re-use at another location after the render safe mission is completed STATE OF TECHNOLOGY: • Significant technical challenges exist in achieving operational standoff. Standoff is defined as the ability to gather information about, or employ tools against, an explosive ordnance threat at a meaningful physical distance, without the EOD technician or the EOD tool itself needing to be placed directly against or immediately adjacent to the threat. • The Stand Off objective is a novel precision-aiming render safe capability that can be delivered to a meaningful distance from the threat and still deliver accurate, useful results without requiring direct contact or close-in emplacement against the device itself. In some cases, physically touching or bringing a metal object too close to the device may trigger it’s detonation. • The Remote Objective is defined as the ability to employ Joint Service EOD tools using robotic platforms, hook-and-line techniques, or a combination of tools and techniques without the EOD technician being physically present at the threat site. For example, employing a disruptor via a ground robot so that the technician never approaches the device directly. In an existing CBRNE environment or if the unexploded ordinance is associated with a CBRN warhead, is critical to conduct the mission from a remote location. • Current EOD disruptor technology is capable of engaging a threat at a distance once it is properly aimed and fired, but current aiming and emplacement methods require the disruptor to be physically positioned and adjusted by hand, meaning an EOD technician must be directly at the tool to set it up correctly. As a result, even though the disruptor’s terminal effect has standoff, the technician does not retain standoff during the aiming and emplacement process itself. Existing remote delivery methods can get a disruptor near a threat, but it remains difficult to finely position and aim it once it arrives. • Current ground robotic platforms are limited by terrain and access. A threat located on a rooftop, upper floor, or otherwise inaccessible position is simply unreachable by a ground platform, regardless of any aiming capability it might have. Novel aerial delivery capabilities are emerg…

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.11.06
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.11.06
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (6e3b0e43)