startup-tips
Sign in
ClosedR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Technical Data Package Modernization for Information Assurance and Secure Data Exchange

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — USAF(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.11.25
D-49
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DAF27BZ01-DV008 · Solicitation 27.BZ

Background and Problem Statement: The modernization of Technical Data Packages (TDPs) is imperative to address the Air and Space Force’s operational challenges in securely managing large-scale, complex datasets associated with advanced platforms and their sustainment life cycles. Current TDP systems often lack robust Information Assurance (IA) capabilities, seamless integration with Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) environments, and effective mechanisms for secure data exchange across operational networks. This limitation not only hinders data integrity and configuration control but also increases vulnerabilities to cyber threats, jeopardizing mission-critical operations. The rapid pace of platform evolution and the increasing reliance on Model-Based Definition (MBD) and digital twin technologies further exacerbate the need for a comprehensive solution that ensures TDP security, scalability, and operational readiness. Opportunity and Desired Outcome: This Directed to Phase II (D2P2) SBIR effort aims to develop an innovative, scalable, and secure solution to modernize TDPs to support the lifecycle of highly complex Air and Space Force platforms. The envisioned solution will integrate advanced IA protocols, cryptographic protections, and tools for encrypted data exchange to facilitate the secure management of the "as-sustained" configuration state of critical assets. The outcome will be a functional prototype capable of enabling secure TDP lifecycle management while aligning with the Trusted AI and Autonomy modernization priorities and Zero Trust Architecture principles. The proposed solution will enhance operational efficiency, minimize cyber risks, and establish a foundation for scalable implementation across DoD platforms. The project’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL) at the start is anticipated to be TRL 4, with the target of reaching a minimum TRL 6 by the conclusion of Phase II, including validation of core capabilities in a relevant operational environment. Required Efforts and Phase Activities: To achieve the stated objectives, the following efforts and activities are required for each phase of the project: Phase II: Develop a secure visualization tool for displaying large-scale MBD geometry and associated data through encrypted web-based interfaces. Implement an encrypted configuration management system to maintain and update the "as-sustained" asset state while ensuring strict data integrity. Create advanced tools for automated data quality checks, incorporating rules-based IA compliance validation to ensure all TDPs meet security and contractual requirements. Design an end-to-end encrypted exchange framework for TDPs, incorporating user authentication, authorization, and audit trails while conforming to DoD Zero Trust Architecture guidelines. Integrate AI/ML methodologies to enable secure damage detection, sustainment planning, and actionable insights into asset health. Demonstrate the prototype in an operationally relevant environment, proving feasibility, security compliance, and system performance in handling large and diverse data streams. Minimum Deliverables: A secure web-based MBD visualization prototype capable of rendering large-scale geometry and TDP datasets with sub-second response times and role-based access controls. Tools for encrypted configuration management and secure "as-sustained" state maintenance, integrated with PLM systems. An automated framework for data quality checks and IA compliance validation of TDPs using defined security protocols and rules-based engines. A cryptographic data transfer and exchange framework, with test results demonstrating alignment with DoD security policies and successful inter-organizational data exchange. Technical documentation detailing methodologies, system architecture, and IA protocols implemented during the project, including recommendations for further scaling and operationalization. A transition plan for integrating the developed TDP modernization techno…

Category
R&D
Industry
AI & Data
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.10.07
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.10.07
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 2h ago — 최초 수집 (c28a7a7a)