startup-tips
Sign in
OpenR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Smart Venues and Stadiums

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — OSD(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.10.21
D-10
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic OSW26BZ06-DV031 · Solicitation 26.BZ

The realistic near-to-mid-term serviceable addressable market for private 5G/6G-ready platforms among U.S. venues and stadiums is a subset of venues with acute connectivity, safety, and operational pain: major-league and collegiate stadiums, multi-purpose arenas, outdoor amphitheaters, and convention/exhibition centers that host recurring high-density events, require public-safety-grade coverage throughout bowls, concourses, tunnels, and back-of-house areas, and are increasingly asked to support fan-facing digital experiences, cashier less concessions, camera and sensor networks, and first-responder communications simultaneously on event day. Venues already invest heavily in connectivity infrastructure, yet several published industry reports indicate persistent cost and coverage pain. Distributed Antenna System (DAS) deployments in large public venues have grown from a few million dollars in early builds to routinely tens of millions of dollars. Independent of venue scale, active multi-carrier DAS hardware and installation is commonly quoted at $5–$10 per square foot, meaning even a mid-sized 300,000 sq. ft. concourse/bowl footprint implies a multi-million-dollar build before integration, spectrum, and ongoing carrier-management costs. The United States features an extensive footprint of sports and entertainment infrastructure, spanning an estimated 2,000 to 5,000 major stadiums and arenas when accounting for all professional, collegiate, and municipal facilities, which further scales to over 15,000 total venues if relatively large localized high school stadium is included. Beyond stadiums and arenas, industry directories catalog well over 400 U.S. convention and exhibition centers, ranging from single-hall regional facilities to multi-million-square-foot complexes. Together, these figures put the large-venue addressable base at several hundred U.S. facilities, before counting mid-sized arenas, amphitheaters, and secondary convention space. Besides, localized specific large gatherings (such as fairs) add up to several thousand. Despite this infrastructure spend, published reviews consistently cite coverage dead zones in lower bowls and concourses, congestion during peak moments (kickoff, halftime, entry/egress), and multi-year vendor lock-in as recurring pain points, and industry reporting suggests that MNO appetite to fund new DAS builds outside "Tier 1" venues (70,000+ capacity or 200+ events/year) is shrinking, leaving small and mid-sized venues with a widening connectivity gap. This segment buys on measurable fan and operational outcomes (dropped-call rate at kickoff, POS uptime, camera uptime, incident-response time), not on global platform standardization, and its stated barriers to adopting anything other than the incumbent DAS/neutral-host model are consistent: high capex and multi-year contract terms, uncertainty about interoperability across multiple wireless carriers that must all be hosted on one system, integration complexity with legacy venue IT/OT and public-safety radio systems, and a lack of in-house RF/cellular engineering staff. An all-open-source stack removes the structural cost and lock-in that makes proprietary DAS platforms a poor fit for this segment's economics. Because OCUDU communicates with the rest of the network over open, standardized interfaces (especially the O-RAN 7.2x split to the O-RU), the network can be assembled from whichever RU vendor and antenna form factor best fits a given venue's bowl geometry, concourse layout, and budget. Together, OCUDU, SD-Core, SD-RAN, and OSC form one integrated, fully open-source 5G stack that a systems integrator can deploy, support, and price as a right-sized, as-a-service offer for a single venue, rather than a broad, vendor-locked, multi-carrier neutral-host platform. The trade-off of an all-open-source stack is the same one seen in other verticals: the burden of proving interoperability, stability, and security shifts from a single vendor's warranty to…

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.10.10
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.10.10
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Sources (3)
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (b579b47d)