Real Time Enhanced Fine Tracking in Directed Energy Applications
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
STTR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DAF26TZ05-NV005 · Solicitation 26.TZ
Current tracking capabilities in DE utilize 2D imagery. Low flying targets against cluttered backgrounds (e.g., drones) present a challenging tracking environment for track algorithms that leverage 2D information alone. A current tracking algorithm might use something like a Fitts correlation tracker [2], which correlates features in the scene with a known template of the target. This requires target identification followed by reference to a look-up table to determine the proper template to use with the correlation tracker, which can be difficult with 2D imagery, as a 2D image of the target will only provide a projection of the target image along the optical axis. 3D coherent imaging with digital holography [3,4] provides a solution for the problems associated with 2D imaging that are described here. Emerging coherent 3D imaging modalities provide complex-valued images (referred to as 2.5D images) with amplitude corresponding to a conventional 2D image and phase corresponding to the range to the target. The range images themselves (which describe the range to the target for each transverse pixel) are highly robust to scintillation and speckle [5,6]. Going further, novel methods in image restoration that include a combination of physics-based [7-11] and machine-learning [10,11] models can provide effective and computationally efficient ways to remove the anisoplanatic distortions in the image. Note that alternative 3D imaging methods do exist (e.g., Geiger mode 3D imaging with avalanche photodiodes [5]). The Phase I effort should include an analysis of existing methods before selecting one to explore for the given application. The topic proposed here is nominally focused on the fine track portion of the DE kill chain, though the technology could be used for acquisition/coarse tracking as well. We briefly summarize the key features of fine tracking in DE, which performers should keep in mind when designing systems: For fine tracking, the atmosphere and aero-optic disturbances impose phase aberrations that can severely degrade imagery. Importantly, tracking at this stage influences aimpoint maintenance, which requires fine track loops to run at much higher framerates (> 1 kHz) to keep up with the changing atmosphere while employing narrower fields of view (fractions of a degree). 3D imaging provides a path forward for enhanced pose estimation and aimpoint maintenance in the context of fine tracking. With regards to illumination for fine tracking, active coherent illumination can result in non-uniform illumination patterns on target, due to scintillation, and in speckle noise in received target imagery. Partially coherent (or multiple coherent) illuminators can reduce the effects of these two noise terms, but at the cost of the ability to perform coherent imaging and/or additional illuminators. On a similar note, coherent imaging techniques (such as digital holography and phase retrieval) can allow for digital image correction of anisoplanatic phase errors using physics-based [7-11] and machine-learning-based [10,11] image reconstruction algorithms. Note that active illumination, in general, enables tracking technology that can perform in day or night. In general, performers should be aware of the general requirements for fine tracking and should tailor designs to the technology best suited for the application. This topic seeks the development and testing of a computationally efficient processing pipeline that meets the requirements for real-time integration into a directed energy system. The goals are to design (Phase I) and demonstrate (Phase II) the processing pipeline for a 3D imaging system that can operate effectively over long standoff ranges through aerooptics/turbulence with extended, non-cooperative targets against cluttered backgrounds. The Phase I effort will design the 3D measurement technique, corresponding algorithms, and a concept for the integrated hardware. This should include analysis of the latency and through…
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- Energy & Climate
- Technology
- Needs verification
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules
Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure
Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties
Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits
How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it
- 18Local entity required
You cannot apply without an entity registered in that country.
- 16Overseas applicants not eligible
Only domestically registered companies may apply.
- 10Own contribution not stated· evidence needs verification
R&D and pilot programmes commonly require one. Confirm the ratio.
- 10Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification
The list of required documents was not collected.
- 8Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification
Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.
- 7Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification
Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.
- 6Award size not stated· evidence needs verification
The announcement does not state how much is available.
- 6Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification
Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.
- · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
- · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
- · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
- · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
- · The required own-contribution ratio is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
- · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
- · The award size is not stated (needs verification).
- · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).
Generated by local:rules-v1 · 4h ago
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is U.S. Department of War — USAF. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.
- NDA
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Data rights
- Needs verification
- Disclosure depth
- Needs verification
- File patent first?
- Not applicable
- Reuse of submissions
- Needs verification
- Publicity obligation
- Needs verification
- Exposure score
- Needs verification
- · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
- · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
- · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
- · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
- · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
- · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
- · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
- · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
- · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
- · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
- · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
- HIGHPoC/공동개발 IP 귀속 조항 확인
공동개발 산출물의 지분·개선발명(improvement) 귀속·배경지식(background IP) 분리 조항을 협약서에서 확인하십시오.
- MEDIUMRequest an NDA
Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.
4 evidence item(s) from the source
- UNKNOWN
No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.
Source link - UNKNOWN
No NDA clause could be found.
Source link - UNKNOWN
IP ownership terms could not be found.
Source link - UNKNOWN
Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.
Source link
- · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
- · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
- · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
- · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
- · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
- · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 4h ago
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- − 현지 법인 설립이 필요합니다.
- − 해외 기업은 지원할 수 없습니다.
- ! IP 귀속 조항이 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
- ! 중복 수혜 제한 규정을 사전에 확인하십시오.
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- Support to awareness raising about the Arctic communities, including Indigenous People
🇪🇺 European Union · R&D program · European Commission
Needs verificationD-DAY - Renewable energy financing mechanism technology specific
🇪🇺 European Union · R&D program · European Commission
Needs verificationD-12 - Strategic Nature Projects
🇪🇺 European Union · R&D program · European Commission
Needs verificationD-14 - Centres of Vocational Excellence
🇪🇺 European Union · R&D program · European Commission
Needs verificationD-14 - Critical Facilities Serving Space EEE components for EU non-dependence – High and Very High Energy Irradiation Test Facility Market Deployment
🇪🇺 European Union · R&D program · European Commission
€3M ~ €4MD-14
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.08.20
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.08.20
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- local:rules-v1 · 4h ago
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 2h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 2h ago
- · 4h ago — 변경 감지되어 갱신 (8c0db0b5)
- · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (44f3f612)