startup-tips
Sign in
UpcomingR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Real Time Enhanced Fine Tracking in Directed Energy Applications

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — USAF(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.09.23
D-34
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

STTR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DAF26TZ05-NV005 · Solicitation 26.TZ

Current tracking capabilities in DE utilize 2D imagery. Low flying targets against cluttered backgrounds (e.g., drones) present a challenging tracking environment for track algorithms that leverage 2D information alone. A current tracking algorithm might use something like a Fitts correlation tracker [2], which correlates features in the scene with a known template of the target. This requires target identification followed by reference to a look-up table to determine the proper template to use with the correlation tracker, which can be difficult with 2D imagery, as a 2D image of the target will only provide a projection of the target image along the optical axis. 3D coherent imaging with digital holography [3,4] provides a solution for the problems associated with 2D imaging that are described here. Emerging coherent 3D imaging modalities provide complex-valued images (referred to as 2.5D images) with amplitude corresponding to a conventional 2D image and phase corresponding to the range to the target. The range images themselves (which describe the range to the target for each transverse pixel) are highly robust to scintillation and speckle [5,6]. Going further, novel methods in image restoration that include a combination of physics-based [7-11] and machine-learning [10,11] models can provide effective and computationally efficient ways to remove the anisoplanatic distortions in the image. Note that alternative 3D imaging methods do exist (e.g., Geiger mode 3D imaging with avalanche photodiodes [5]). The Phase I effort should include an analysis of existing methods before selecting one to explore for the given application. The topic proposed here is nominally focused on the fine track portion of the DE kill chain, though the technology could be used for acquisition/coarse tracking as well. We briefly summarize the key features of fine tracking in DE, which performers should keep in mind when designing systems: For fine tracking, the atmosphere and aero-optic disturbances impose phase aberrations that can severely degrade imagery. Importantly, tracking at this stage influences aimpoint maintenance, which requires fine track loops to run at much higher framerates (> 1 kHz) to keep up with the changing atmosphere while employing narrower fields of view (fractions of a degree). 3D imaging provides a path forward for enhanced pose estimation and aimpoint maintenance in the context of fine tracking. With regards to illumination for fine tracking, active coherent illumination can result in non-uniform illumination patterns on target, due to scintillation, and in speckle noise in received target imagery. Partially coherent (or multiple coherent) illuminators can reduce the effects of these two noise terms, but at the cost of the ability to perform coherent imaging and/or additional illuminators. On a similar note, coherent imaging techniques (such as digital holography and phase retrieval) can allow for digital image correction of anisoplanatic phase errors using physics-based [7-11] and machine-learning-based [10,11] image reconstruction algorithms. Note that active illumination, in general, enables tracking technology that can perform in day or night. In general, performers should be aware of the general requirements for fine tracking and should tailor designs to the technology best suited for the application. This topic seeks the development and testing of a computationally efficient processing pipeline that meets the requirements for real-time integration into a directed energy system. The goals are to design (Phase I) and demonstrate (Phase II) the processing pipeline for a 3D imaging system that can operate effectively over long standoff ranges through aerooptics/turbulence with extended, non-cooperative targets against cluttered backgrounds. The Phase I effort will design the 3D measurement technique, corresponding algorithms, and a concept for the integrated hardware. This should include analysis of the latency and through…

Category
R&D
Industry
Energy & Climate
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

Overall: Not assessable (insufficient data)
Eligibility risk57

Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules

Financial risk36

Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure

Execution risk22

Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties

Contract risk27

Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits

IP & idea exposure riskNeeds verification

How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it

Key risk factors
  • 18
    Local entity required

    You cannot apply without an entity registered in that country.

  • 16
    Overseas applicants not eligible

    Only domestically registered companies may apply.

  • 10
    Own contribution not stated· evidence needs verification

    R&D and pilot programmes commonly require one. Confirm the ratio.

  • 10
    Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification

    The list of required documents was not collected.

  • 8
    Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification

    Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.

  • 7
    Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Award size not stated· evidence needs verification

    The announcement does not state how much is available.

  • 6
    Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.

14 item(s) need verification
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The required own-contribution ratio is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The award size is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).

Generated by local:rules-v1 · 4h ago

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

Required documents unknown

The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is U.S. Department of War — USAF. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.

NDA
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Data rights
Needs verification
Disclosure depth
Needs verification
File patent first?
Not applicable
Reuse of submissions
Needs verification
Publicity obligation
Needs verification
Exposure score
Needs verification
Safe to disclose
  • · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
  • · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
  • · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
  • · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
  • · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
Keep to a minimum
  • · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
  • · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
  • · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
  • · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
  • · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
  • · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
Recommended actions
  • HIGHPoC/공동개발 IP 귀속 조항 확인

    공동개발 산출물의 지분·개선발명(improvement) 귀속·배경지식(background IP) 분리 조항을 협약서에서 확인하십시오.

  • MEDIUMRequest an NDA

    Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.

4 evidence item(s) from the source
  • UNKNOWN

    No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    No NDA clause could be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    IP ownership terms could not be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.

    Source link
Needs verification (8)
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).

This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 4h ago

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)41

Heuristic from award size and type

Attractiveness46

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • 현지 법인 설립이 필요합니다.
  • 해외 기업은 지원할 수 없습니다.
Cautions
  • ! IP 귀속 조항이 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! 중복 수혜 제한 규정을 사전에 확인하십시오.

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.08.20
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.08.20
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
local:rules-v1 · 4h ago
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago변경 감지되어 갱신 (8c0db0b5)
  • · 4h ago최초 수집 (44f3f612)