startup-tips
Sign in
ClosedR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Multiple Telemetry Site Signal Source Synchronization

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — USAF(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.11.25
D-49
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DAF27BZ01-NV003 · Solicitation 27.BZ

Flight test missions that traverse multiple Test Ranges (e.g. hypersonic vehicles/weapons, cruise missiles, long-range weapon systems etc.) or that require different test support infrastructures (e.g. sea range, targets, threat simulators, etc.) at remote Test Ranges, require telemetry receive stations along the flight paths to receive real-time telemetry and then relay that data via ground networks to the control room monitoring the mission. In past mission pre-flight scenarios, remote telemetry receive site to control room links were checked individually. This was accomplished with a local bore sight signal simulator that transmitted a known test pattern at the center frequency of the actual test article. The telemetry receive site would receive the radio frequency signal, demodulate/decode it, then send the data via Internet protocol (IP) networks to the control room. In the control room the received data was verified to be correct as the bit pattern received could be compared to the bit pattern transmitted. This was accomplished for each local and remote telemetry receive site prior to the mission.During the test, each local and remote telemetry receive site would send data to the control room and a manual switch would be accomplished between each data source based on data quality that was determined manually. Note, this selection was not automated.With the invent of best source selection using data quality metrics transferred over IP networks via data quality encapsulation [1], no longer is election of multiple data sources done manually. Telemetry receivers now assess received data quality and assign a bit error probability to a packet of data prior to sending it to the best source selector in the control room. A best source selector (BSS) inputs these multiple streams, performs time alignment, then using the data quality metric, selects the best data to output on a bit-by-bit basis. This output is the best data using all available data streams from diverse receive sites.Though higher quality, near error-free data is now provided to the control room, the addition of the BSS has revealed a shortfall. The entire data path from remote receive sites to transport through best source selection to control room cannot be tested as a complete system to assess mission readiness. The traditional method of pre-flight checks cannot be used. Why? The best source selector will not be able to correlate the multiple data streams from remote sites as the signal sources will not be correlated. This results in the configuration and operation of the BSS being unknown until the test mission. The proposed work will focus on solving this shortfall resulting in a networked, synchronized telemetry validation system capable of simulating a test vehicle's telemetry signal at multiple ground stations simultaneously. Stated another way, the proposed system must simulate the test article signal as if all telemetry receive stations could “see” the test article and simultaneously receive the telemetry signal. This capability will allow test ranges to perform pre-mission verification of the entire telemetry infrastructure. This would include all participating receive antennas, distribution networks, and best source selector(s) to control room displays to ensure full system connectivity and performance before supporting a live mission.

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.10.07
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.10.07
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 2h ago — 최초 수집 (8b78a384)