startup-tips
Sign in
UpcomingR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Long-Range, Expendable Autonomous Air Vehicle for Distributed Effects in Contested Environments

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — USAF(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2027.01.06
D-61
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DAF27BZ02-DV020 · Solicitation 27.BZ

Future contested operations may require the ability to generate large numbers of distributed airborne effects at ranges beyond those achievable by many existing Group 2/3 UAS.The desired system should combine sufficient aerodynamic efficiency, propulsion performance, autonomous mission execution, modular payload integration, resilient navigation, and low-cost manufacturing to enable operations at ranges between approximately 400 and 1,200 NM. Solutions should emphasize a modular vehicle architecture allowing Government or third-party payloads, autonomy, navigation, and communications components to be integrated without redesigning the entire aircraft. Range and Mission Performance ≥400 NM threshold to 1,200 NM with demonstrable varying ranges under a clearly defined mission profile.Document payload/range/endurance trade space.Characterize representative payload, launch conditions, altitude, speed, propulsion configuration, and mission profile.Demonstrate sufficient aerodynamic and propulsion efficiency to achieve long-range operation at acceptable recurring cost. Autonomous Mission ExecutionAutonomous launch and transition to mission flight.Autonomous navigation and mission execution.Autonomous terminal mission functions appropriate to the proposed concept.Continued mission execution during intermittent or extended loss of command-and-control connectivity.Deterministic and configurable lost-link behavior.Mission-planning interfaces that minimize operator workload.Architecture capable of incorporating Government-provided autonomy.Resilient NavigationMaintain useful navigation during representative GNSS degradation, denial, interference, or loss. Characterize navigation performance, accumulated error, availability, and recovery. Support integration of complementary navigation sources. Collaborative navigation approaches are of interest where sufficiently mature for Phase II integration and flight demonstration. Navigation technologies should be mature enough to support the overall D2P2 schedule; maturation of 5-6 TRL fundamental navigation concepts is not the primary intent of this effort..Modular Mission ArchitectureModular mechanical, electrical, power, data, and software interfaces.Integration of Government or third-party payloads without fundamental air-vehicle redesign.Architecture capable of accepting Government-provided autonomy, navigation, communications, and payload components.Document Government-accessible interfaces necessary for transition.PropulsionCharacterize propulsion performance.Quantify fuel/energy consumption across representative mission profiles.Identify propulsion reliability and remaining maturation risks.Characterize range, payload, and propulsion trade space.Environmental and Structural PerformanceDemonstrate environmental and structural suitability for representative operational employment.Characterize launch loads, flight loads, environmental limitations, and relevant storage/transport constraints.Affordability and Scalable ManufacturingTreat recurring unit cost as a primary system-level design consideration.Identify major unit-cost drivers.Demonstrate production-relevant manufacturing approaches.Reduce dependence on scarce materials, specialized tooling, and labor-intensive production where technically feasible.Quantify production scalability, lead time, labor content, and supply-chain risks.Consider rapid, distributed, or high-rate manufacturing approaches.The Government is interested in existing technologies requiring integration and maturation, not clean-sheet conceptual aircraft requiring extended basic research.

Category
R&D
Industry
Mobility
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.11.06
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.11.06
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (eee04ebb)