startup-tips
Sign in
UpcomingR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Dynamic Sensor-Tasking and Routing System for Subsurface Hazard Detection

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of War — DTRA(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2027.01.06
D-61
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic DTR27BZ02-NV003 · Solicitation 27.BZ

Current field-deployable capabilities for WMD device and component defeat, route reconnaissance, and sensitive site exploitation have made significant strides in rapid surface-level mapping and visual threat triage using unmanned aerial and ground platforms. However, these operational systems encounter a critical bottleneck when confronting subsurface hazards. Visual, optical, and topographic sensors are fundamentally blind to threats that are partially buried, completely subsurface, or obscured beneath soil, blast debris, or disturbed earth. When subsurface geophysical instruments are integrated onto these unmanned platforms to address this blind spot, current field architecture suffers from a severe "collect everything" bottleneck. Lacking localized intelligence, platforms typically execute static, pre-programmed survey scripts which force sensors to operate continuously and indiscriminately across an entire area. This floods constrained tactical communication networks with massive volumes of raw sensor data, overwhelms field computing devices, drastically slows operational tempo, and results in sensor operational blindness when local soil physics degrade or invalidate specific sensor modalities. When conducting standoff reconnaissance of suspected hazard areas—which may contain buried chemical or biological munitions, radiological dispersal device (RDD) components, bulk precursor storage vessels, or associated explosive triggers and conventional ordnance—these bottlenecks force operators into dangerous, prolonged exposure on target. Furthermore, relying on rigid, static classical logic to manage these complex sensor suites in real time introduces a critical limitation, as traditional rule-based programs cannot adapt to highly dynamic, uncharacterized environments where the boundary conditions are not known beforehand. A proactive system is required to answer: "Given this specific environment and mission profile, which sensor should be deployed first, what detection threshold triggers the next modality, and which sensors may be inhibited due to the environment or other physical boundary conditions?" This topic seeks an adaptive, machine-learning-driven sensor-tasking and routing decision engine capable of scheduling sensor deployment and routing platform payloads in real time using probabilistic, data-driven optimization methods. The primary need is an intelligent edge capability that continuously monitors changing site conditions and dynamically queues, activates, or inhibits physical sensor payloads on an autonomous platform. Rather than streaming raw data or running all sensors simultaneously, the system must govern sensor execution through learned decision policies (utilizing techniques such as reinforcement learning, contextual bandits, or partially observable Markov decision processes) that optimize performance based on sensor-inferred environmental physics (such as electrical conductivity and dielectric permittivity), immediate mission constraints (such as required advance speed, standoff distance requirements, and target priority), and real-time sensor performance signatures. When an initial screening modality detects an anomaly, the engine must evaluate the environmental context to dynamically determine if a secondary, higher-fidelity sensor is required to verify and classify the threat, or if the platform should continue its route. By automating this sensor-queuing and routing logic at the edge through explainable and efficient AI, the system will overcome the subsurface bottlenecks of current field suites, eliminate tactical network saturation, minimize time on target, and ensure reliable detection and defeat of subsurface WMD devices and associated hazards across diverse, uncharacterized operational environments. State of Technology: Currently deployed military and commercial technologies have reached a high level of maturity in distinct, stove-piped domains, but they do not integrate these capabilities into a s…

Category
R&D
Industry
Needs verification
Technology
IoT / Edge
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

No IP assessment yet.

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)Needs verification

Heuristic from award size and type

AttractivenessNeeds verification

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.11.06
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.11.06
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (889dfe16)