startup-tips
Sign in
OpenR&D programAuto-collected, not reviewed

Development of devices, diagnostic technologies, or digital health tools for treatment, detection, and diagnosis of Pediatric Cancers and/or Rare Cancers.

🇺🇸 United States·U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — NIH(Government)
Funding
Needs verification
Deadline
2026.09.21
D-32
Official noticeApplyOverseas applicants not eligible ExportPDF

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

SBIR · Phase: Phase I · Topic 2 · Solicitation 75N98026R00109

About 9,550 children in the United States under the age of 15 will be diagnosed with cancer in 2025 (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-in-children/key-statistics.html). Cancer is the leading cause of death from disease in children ages 1 to 14 in the US after infancy. Similarly, as a group, rare cancers are the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States (https://rarecancer.org/). For the purposes of this solicitation, a rare cancer is defined in accordance with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Orphan Drug Act as a malignancy with a total U.S. prevalence of fewer than 200,000 individuals. Prevalence estimates should be supported by authoritative data sources (e.g., SEER) or where direct estimates are not available, by scientifically justified epidemiologic approximations based on published literature. This definition is intended to capture clinically and biologically relevant rare cancer populations that may not be fully represented in existing rare disease databases. Applications must clearly describe how the proposed technological approach has the potential to result in a meaningful improvement in patient survival and/or to address areas of significant unmet medical need where the current standard of care has demonstrated limited progress. Access the NCI Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) database (https://seer.cancer.gov/) for more information regarding 5-year cancer survival rates. Because of smaller patient populations and challenging development pathways, development of new technologies focused on pediatric and rare cancers lag significantly compared to other major cancers. Innovative and transformative solutions focused on prevention, diagnosis, detection, and treatment in both pediatric cancers and rare cancers are urgently needed. Rather than just the tried and tested approaches that have not led to much success and progress, bold and “out of the box” ideas that are still based on sound scientific premise are needed to make a significant impact in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with pediatric and/or rare cancer. Thus, the NCI SBIR Development Center has developed the NCI SBIR Innovative Concept Award program to encourage the development of high-risk innovative and disruptive technologies. The Concept Award program will provide funding to small businesses to explore the technical feasibility and demonstrate proof of concept for the development of highly innovative therapies, devices, diagnostic tools, or preventive strategies focused on pediatric and rare cancers. The focus is on innovation and “out of the box” ideas that have not been tried and tested before. So, preliminary data is not required; however, proposed ideas should have sound scientific premise either based on the offeror’s own research or referenced literature evidence. Offerors are eligible to apply if they have disruptive ideas based on sound scientific premise with a potential to make an impact in these cancers. The goal of the funding is for offerors to generate de-risking technical data that provides key proof of concept validation. We also want the offerors to explore the commercial potential and development path of the technology during the award period. In addition to funding, the program will also provide additional business and commercialization resources including entrepreneurship training to explore and refine the business model and commercialization plan. Activities and deliverables proposed by the offerors would differ based on their technology types and stage of development. However, the offerors should ensure that they clearly identify the clinical problem and cancer type(s) that the proposal will focus on with adequate justification. In addition, the offerors should propose experiments to obtain initial de-risking and proof-of-concept data and at the completion of the project present a report with the results of the experiments to the NCI. Examples of activities an…

Category
R&D
Industry
Bio & Healthcare
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
Needs verification
Currency
USD
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
-

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
0명 ~ 500명
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇺🇸 United States
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
No
Local entity
Required
Location condition
미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

Overall: Not assessable (insufficient data)
Eligibility risk57

Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules

Financial risk36

Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure

Execution risk22

Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties

Contract risk27

Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits

IP & idea exposure riskNeeds verification

How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it

Key risk factors
  • 18
    Local entity required

    You cannot apply without an entity registered in that country.

  • 16
    Overseas applicants not eligible

    Only domestically registered companies may apply.

  • 10
    Own contribution not stated· evidence needs verification

    R&D and pilot programmes commonly require one. Confirm the ratio.

  • 10
    Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification

    The list of required documents was not collected.

  • 8
    Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification

    Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.

  • 7
    Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Award size not stated· evidence needs verification

    The announcement does not state how much is available.

  • 6
    Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.

14 item(s) need verification
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The required own-contribution ratio is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The award size is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).

Generated by local:rules-v1 · 4h ago

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

Required documents unknown

The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is U.S. Department of Health and Human Services — NIH. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.

NDA
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Data rights
Needs verification
Disclosure depth
Needs verification
File patent first?
Not applicable
Reuse of submissions
Needs verification
Publicity obligation
Needs verification
Exposure score
Needs verification
Safe to disclose
  • · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
  • · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
  • · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
  • · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
  • · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
Keep to a minimum
  • · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
  • · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
  • · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
  • · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
  • · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
  • · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
Recommended actions
  • HIGHPoC/공동개발 IP 귀속 조항 확인

    공동개발 산출물의 지분·개선발명(improvement) 귀속·배경지식(background IP) 분리 조항을 협약서에서 확인하십시오.

  • MEDIUMRequest an NDA

    Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.

4 evidence item(s) from the source
  • UNKNOWN

    No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    No NDA clause could be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    IP ownership terms could not be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.

    Source link
Needs verification (8)
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).

This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 4h ago

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)41

Heuristic from award size and type

Attractiveness46

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • 현지 법인 설립이 필요합니다.
  • 해외 기업은 지원할 수 없습니다.
Cautions
  • ! IP 귀속 조항이 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! 중복 수혜 제한 규정을 사전에 확인하십시오.

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.08.20
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.08.20
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
local:rules-v1 · 4h ago
Snapshot history
  • · 4h ago변경 감지되어 갱신 (7f2bae3a)
  • · 4h ago최초 수집 (b733fd68)