Configurable Operator Decision Models for Constructive Test and Evaluation Simulations
Overview
What you need to judge this in 30 seconds
SBIR · Phase: BOTH · Topic MDA27BZ02-DV009 · Solicitation 27.BZ
Government problem: Missile defense test and evaluation rely on constructive simulations to examine large numbers of scenarios, explore operational concepts, evaluate system-of-systems interactions, and reduce risk before live flight events. These simulations can represent physical platforms, sensors, weapons, communications, terrain, and threat laydowns, but operator decision effects are often represented by fixed scripts, simplified timing rules, or manually coded behaviors. This can cause analysis results to overstate or understate operational performance because human choices influence detection, classification, engagement, prioritization, communication, and response timing across the kill chain. Capability gap: The Government lacks a reusable and validated way to generate, configure, execute, and assess operator decision representations across many scenario variations and proficiency levels. Current approaches can require extensive custom programming for each model, scenario, or operator role; may not provide traceable rationale for actions taken during simulation; and may be difficult to compare across test events, analysis teams, or simulation environments. The gap affects the Government’s ability to understand sensitivity to operator behavior, evaluate alternate tactics, and support VV&A with documented evidence of intended use, assumptions, limitations, data pedigree, and risk. Why innovative solutions are likely available: The Government believes innovative small businesses can apply advances from artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled simulation, human behavior representation, synthetic data generation, reinforcement learning, design of experiments, digital engineering, development, security, and operations, and modular simulation integration to address this problem. Related industry capabilities already demonstrate AI-assisted constructive simulation, synthetic data generation, intelligent agents, and integration of commercial simulation toolchains with Government simulation environments. This topic seeks to mature those types of innovations into a Government-purpose capability suitable for missile defense test and evaluation workflows. Government interest: The Government is not seeking a vendor white paper, a visualization-only training game, or a single hard-coded operator model. The Government is seeking a Direct-to-Phase-II prototype capability that can be adapted to multiple missile defense analysis contexts; that can use Government-provided scenarios, models, data, and subject matter expert (SME) input; that can be evaluated against explicit measures of performance and effectiveness; and that can produce artifacts needed for future transition, reuse, and accreditation. Desired characteristics: •Open, modular interfaces for integration with constructive simulations and analysis workflows. •Configurable operator roles and behavior profiles that can be reviewed and adjusted by authorized Government analysts or SMEs. •Support for scenario ensembles, design of experiments, and repeatable Monte Carlo-style analysis. •Decision traceability, data provenance, uncertainty characterization, and explainable outputs suitable for analyst review. Responsible AI, cyber, data-management, and VV&A considerations incorporated from the beginning of Phase II.
- Category
- R&D
- Industry
- Needs verification
- Technology
- Needs verification
- Target stage
- Needs verification
- Project duration
- Needs verification
- Estimated preparation
- Needs verification
Funding
Award size and how it is paid
- Award range
- Needs verification
- Currency
- USD
- Total programme budget
- Needs verification
- Support type
- Needs verification
- Co-funding
- Needs verification
- Matching fund
- Needs verification
- Disbursement
- Needs verification
- Note
- -
Eligibility
Can we actually apply?
SBIR/STTR 은 미국 중소기업만 지원할 수 있습니다(Small Business Act 법정 요건). • 계열사를 포함해 상시 종업원 500명 이하 • 미국 시민 또는 영주권자 1인 이상이 50%를 초과해 직접 소유·지배 • 미국 내 사업장을 두고 주로 미국 내에서 사업을 영위할 것 • 수행책임자(PI)의 주된 근무처가 신청 기업일 것 출처: https://www.sbir.gov/faq/eligibility-requirements
- Company age
- Needs verification
- Employees
- 0명 ~ 500명
- Revenue limits
- Needs verification
- Consortium
- Needs verification
Location Requirements
Geography and legal-entity conditions
- Primary country
- 🇺🇸 United States
- Also eligible
- None
- Foreign companies
- No
- Local entity
- Required
- Location condition
- 미국 내 사업장을 두고 미국 시민·영주권자가 50%를 초과해 소유한 중소기업만 신청할 수 있습니다(법정 요건).
Required Documents
Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions
Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.
Application Process
How you apply
Application process not captured.
Evaluation
Review process and criteria
Evaluation process not captured.
Timeline
Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution
Process steps were not captured.
Equity & Financial Terms
Equity, loans and contract conditions
- Equity required
- Needs verification
- Loan
- Non-dilutive grant
- Duplicate funding
- Needs verification
- IP ownership
- Needs verification
- Deliverable ownership
- Needs verification
- Exclusivity
- Needs verification
- Right of first refusal
- Needs verification
- Audit & settlement
- Needs verification
Risk Intelligence
Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)
No risk assessment yet. Re-analyse from Admin.
IP / Idea Protection
How much of your technology and idea you must disclose
No IP assessment yet.
AI Analysis
Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness
From paperwork and review stages
Heuristic from award size and type
Amount, terms and IP combined
Weighted average of five dimensions
- Needs verification
- Needs verification
- Nothing flagged
Similar Programs
Comparable by type, country and technology
- Rapidly Deployable Aerial Interdiction Cluster
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — MDA
Needs verificationD-61 - Mobile Sea-Based Launch Platform
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — MDA
Needs verificationD-61 - Performance Enhancement of Solid Rocket Motors Applied to Existing Systems
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — MDA
Needs verificationD-61 - Multi-Fidelity Transfer Learning for Defense Applications
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — MDA
Needs verificationD-61 - Low Cost Infrared Seeker
🇺🇸 United States · R&D program · U.S. Department of War — MDA
Needs verificationD-61
Source & Provenance
Every value carries its source URL and fetch time
- Official URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Application URL
- https://www.dodsbirsttr.mil/topics-app/
- Last fetched
- 2026.11.06
- Human review
- Not reviewed — check the official announcement
- First seen
- 2026.11.06
- Data status
- Auto-collected, not reviewed
- AI enrichment
- Needs verification
- PRIMARY
- HTMLSBIR/STTR 자격요건 (법정)
Fetched 4h ago
- HTML발주 기관 공식 공고
Fetched 4h ago
- · 4h ago — 최초 수집 (b8477fac)