startup-tips
Sign in
OpenSpace & infrastructureAuto-collected, not reviewed

岡崎市消費者向け製品製造工場等建設奨励金

🇯🇵 Japan · 愛知県·jGrants — 実施機関未確認(Government)
Funding
up to ¥2.5B
≈ ₩22.3B (FX as of 2026-07-01)
Deadline
2027.03.31
D-187

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

用途: 設備整備・IT導入をしたい · 対象地域: 愛知県 · 補助率: 固定資産取得費用の10%~40%分

■目的・概要 岡崎市内で新たに土地を取得し、一般消費者向けの製品(BtoC製品)を製造する工場等を新設または増設する事業者に対し、固定資産取得費用の一部を奨励金として交付する制度です。 ■応募資格 市内で新たに20,000平方メートル以上の土地を取得し、消費者向け製品(BtoC製品)を製造する工場等を新増設する事業者が対象となります。 【投資規模要件】 大企業 :25億円以上 中小企業:5億円以上 【雇用要件】 新規雇用の増 大企業 :20人以上 中小企業:5人以上 ■地理条件 愛知県岡崎市内 ■備考 ・生産のための設備投資を検討している場合は、事前に問い合わせしてください。 ・奨励金の認定及び交付については、その可否を審査により決定します。 ・対象となる消費者向け製品(BtoC製品)とは、主として一般消費者の生活の用に供される製品を指しますが、消費生活用製品安全法(昭和48年法律第31号)別表に掲げられている製品は除外されます。 ・その他の奨励制度との併用はできません。 ■問合せ先 岡崎市役所 商工労政課 ものづくり支援係 電話番号: 0564-23-6287 ファクス番号: 0564-23-6213 住所: 〒444-8601 愛知県岡崎市十王町2丁目9番地(西庁舎地下1階) ■参照URL https://www.city.okazaki.lg.jp/1400/1404/1413/p011141.html

Category
Facility
Industry
ICT & Software
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
up to ¥2.5B
Currency
JPY
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
補助率 固定資産取得費用の10%~40%分

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

対象業種: 製造業 / 従業員数: 従業員数の制約なし / 地域要件: 愛知県岡崎市

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
Needs verification
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇯🇵 Japan
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
Needs verification
Local entity
Required
Location condition
愛知県 소재 사업자를 대상으로 합니다(원문 확인 필요).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Needs verification
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

Overall: Not assessable (insufficient data)
Eligibility risk43

Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules

Financial risk20

Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure

Execution risk22

Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties

Contract risk27

Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits

IP & idea exposure riskNeeds verification

How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it

Key risk factors
  • 18
    Local entity required

    You cannot apply without an entity registered in that country.

  • 10
    Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification

    The list of required documents was not collected.

  • 8
    Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification

    Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.

  • 7
    Overseas eligibility not stated· evidence needs verification

    Whether an overseas company may take part has to be confirmed.

  • 7
    Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Duplicate-support rule not stated· evidence needs verification

    Whether parallel support is allowed has to be confirmed.

13 item(s) need verification
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an overseas company may apply is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).

Generated by local:rules-v1 · 19d ago

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

Required documents unknown

The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is jGrants — 実施機関未確認. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.

NDA
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Data rights
Needs verification
Disclosure depth
Needs verification
File patent first?
Not applicable
Reuse of submissions
Needs verification
Publicity obligation
Needs verification
Exposure score
Needs verification
Safe to disclose
  • · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
  • · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
  • · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
  • · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
  • · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
Keep to a minimum
  • · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
  • · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
  • · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
  • · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
  • · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
  • · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
Recommended actions
  • MEDIUMRequest an NDA

    Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.

4 evidence item(s) from the source
  • UNKNOWN

    No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    No NDA clause could be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    IP ownership terms could not be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.

    Source link
Needs verification (8)
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).

This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 19d ago

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)61

Heuristic from award size and type

Attractiveness66

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • ! 융자인지 무상 지원인지 공고에서 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! 해외기업 지원 가능 여부가 공고에서 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! IP 귀속 조항이 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! 중복 수혜 제한 규정을 사전에 확인하십시오.

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.09.17
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.08.20
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
local:rules-v1 · 2026.08.20
Sources (2)
Snapshot history
  • · 2026.08.20 — 최초 수집 (d513a5ac)