startup-tips
Sign in
OpenSpace & infrastructureAuto-collected, not reviewed

【埼玉県】埼玉県民間事業者CO₂排出削減設備導入補助金(緊急対策枠)

🇯🇵 Japan · 埼玉県·埼玉県(Government)
Funding
up to ¥5M
≈ ₩44.5M (FX as of 2026-07-01)
Deadline
2027.03.31
D-187

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

用途: 設備整備・IT導入をしたい / エコ・SDGs活動支援がほしい · 対象地域: 埼玉県 · 補助率: 1/2

■参照ホームページ ※Jグランツで本補助金の申請受付を行っておりません。申請手続き等の詳細については、以下HPをご確認ください。 https://www.pref.saitama.lg.jp/a0502/hojokin/r7co2hojo-kinkyutaisaku.html ■目的・概要 本事業は、国の「物価高騰対応重点支援地方創生臨時交付金」を活用した事業です。 中小企業等におけるエネルギー使用量及びCO₂排出量の削減による体質改善を更に促すため、空調設備・ボイラー等の高効率タイプへの更新や蓄電池と組み合わせた太陽光発電設備などの導入に要する経費の一部を補助します。 ■対象事業者 民間事業者(埼玉県内で1年以上事業活動を営んでいる法人及び個人事業主) ただし、会社にあっては、中小企業者(中小企業基本法(昭和38年法律第154号)第2条第1項の各号のいずれかに該当するもの)に限る。 ※令和8年度予算によるスマートCO2排出削減設備導入補助金を受給した者又は受給予定者は対象外です。 ※本ページに「従業員数の上限」が「300名以下」という記載がありますが、法人の種類によって従業員数の上限等は異なります。 詳細はホームページをご確認ください。 ■対象事業所 ・申請時点で稼働期間が1年以上(再生可能エネルギー利用設備を設置する場合は1か月以上)の県内に所在する事業所 ・自ら所有又は賃貸借している事業所 ※住居兼事業所の場合、住居部分は対象外 (例:再生可能エネルギーの利用設備を設置する場合で、エネルギー使用量のメーター等が1つのみで事業所用と居住用とで分かれていない場合) (例:事業所部分と居住部分が混在している場所に更新設備がある場合など) ■補助対象機器 補助対象経費が60万円以上の➀~③の事業 ※ただし、CO₂排出量が削減されること ① 高効率設備* への更新 空調設備、ボイラー本体設備、コンプレッサー設備、変圧器、冷凍冷蔵庫設備など ・既存設備は15年以上使用していると認められる設備(製造から15年以上経過している設備)であること ・照明設備は対象外 ・能力増強は原則対象外 ②再生可能エネルギーの利用設備 太陽光発電設備、バイオマス発電設備、小水力発電設備等の再エネ設備、再エネ設備と組み合わせた蓄電池設置など ・年間想定発電量のうち65%程度を目安に当該事業所で自ら消費すること ・太陽光発電は蓄電池を同時に導入すること ※既存の太陽光発電設備に蓄電池のみ新規設置することは可能 ③CO₂排出量の少ない燃料等を使用した設備への更新等 重油焚ボイラーの都市ガスやLPG等への燃料転換・ヒートポンプ化、コジェネレーション設備、インバータ制御等の導入など ・設備更新の場合は、 高効率設備* への更新であること 高効率設備* について 以下のいずれかに該当していること ➀省エネ法のトップランナー基準を達成している設備(基準達成率100%以上の設備) ②経済産業省所管「省エネルギー投資促進支援事業(Ⅲ)設備単位型」の補助対象設備(下記HP参照) https://sii.or.jp/setsubi07r/search/ https://sii.or.jp/setsubi06r/search/ ③その他の設備(一般的な設備と比べ10%以上の省エネ改善効果が確認できるもの) ※③の対象となる設備は、①、②で対象となっていない種類の「設備」です。 ■補助率・補助上限額 補助対象経費の2分の1・上限500万円 ※1者が複数の事業所において申請する場合は、事業所ごとの申請となり、1事業所当たり上限500万円です。 ※1万円未満の端数があるときは、これを切り捨てて得た額となります。 ■申請期間 令和8年4月27日(月)から予算額に達するまで ■申請方法 以下HPをご確認ください。 https://www.pref.saitama.lg.jp/a0502/hojokin/r7co2hojo-kinkyutaisaku.html ■お問合わせ先 埼玉県環境部温暖化対策課計画制度・排出量取引担当 住所:埼玉県さいたま市浦和区高砂3-15-1 第三庁舎2階 電話番号:048-830-3021 E-mail:a3030-29@pref.saitama.lg.jp FAX:048-830-4777

Category
Facility
Industry
ICT & Software
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
up to ¥5M
Currency
JPY
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
補助率 1/2

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

対象業種: 建設業 / 製造業 / サービス業(他に分類されないもの) / 運輸業、郵便業 / 卸売業、小売業 / 宿泊業、飲食サービス業 / 生活関連サービス業、娯楽業 / 医療、福祉 / 従業員数: 300名以下

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
Needs verification
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇯🇵 Japan
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
Needs verification
Local entity
Needs verification
Location condition
埼玉県 소재 사업자를 대상으로 합니다(원문 확인 필요).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Needs verification
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

Overall: Not assessable (insufficient data)
Eligibility risk33

Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules

Financial risk20

Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure

Execution risk22

Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties

Contract risk27

Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits

IP & idea exposure riskNeeds verification

How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it

Key risk factors
  • 10
    Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification

    The list of required documents was not collected.

  • 8
    Local-entity requirement not stated· evidence needs verification

    The announcement does not say whether a local entity is required.

  • 8
    Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification

    Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.

  • 7
    Overseas eligibility not stated· evidence needs verification

    Whether an overseas company may take part has to be confirmed.

  • 7
    Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Duplicate-support rule not stated· evidence needs verification

    Whether parallel support is allowed has to be confirmed.

14 item(s) need verification
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a local entity is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an overseas company may apply is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).

Generated by local:rules-v1 · 19d ago

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

Required documents unknown

The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is 埼玉県. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.

NDA
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Data rights
Needs verification
Disclosure depth
Needs verification
File patent first?
Not applicable
Reuse of submissions
Needs verification
Publicity obligation
Needs verification
Exposure score
Needs verification
Safe to disclose
  • · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
  • · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
  • · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
  • · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
  • · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
Keep to a minimum
  • · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
  • · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
  • · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
  • · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
  • · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
  • · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
Recommended actions
  • MEDIUMRequest an NDA

    Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.

4 evidence item(s) from the source
  • UNKNOWN

    No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    No NDA clause could be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    IP ownership terms could not be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.

    Source link
Needs verification (8)
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).

This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 19d ago

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)41

Heuristic from award size and type

Attractiveness48

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • ! 융자인지 무상 지원인지 공고에서 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! 해외기업 지원 가능 여부가 공고에서 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! IP 귀속 조항이 확인되지 않았습니다 (확인 필요).
  • ! 중복 수혜 제한 규정을 사전에 확인하십시오.

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.09.16
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.08.20
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
local:rules-v1 · 2026.08.20
Sources (2)
Snapshot history
  • · 2026.08.20 — 최초 수집 (bea7e3d3)