startup-tips
Sign in
OpenGrantAuto-collected, not reviewed

令和8年度_産油国石油精製技術等対策事業費補助金(石油天然ガス権益・安定供給の確保に向けた資源国との関係強化支援事業のうち産油・産ガス国産業協力等事業に係るもの)_第3回公募

🇯🇵 Japan · 全国·jGrants — 実施機関未確認(Government)
Funding
up to ¥2.9B
≈ ₩25.8B (FX as of 2026-07-01)
Deadline
2026.09.25
D-5

Overview

What you need to judge this in 30 seconds

用途: 新たな事業を行いたい / 販路拡大・海外展開をしたい / イベント・事業運営支援がほしい / 研究開発・実証事業を行いたい / 人材育成を行いたい / 設備整備・IT導入をしたい / エコ・SDGs活動支援がほしい / 教育・子育て・少子化支援がほしい / スポーツ・文化支援がほしい · 対象地域: 全国 · 補助率: 定額、2/3、1/2

■目的・概要 この補助金は、「産油・産ガス国において、我が国と相手国との間の関係強化に資する多様な人材を育成する事業(以下、「産油・産ガス国高度人材育成支援事業」という。)並びに我が国の有する先端技術の移転、石油産業等の基盤施設・設備の高度化及び石油及び可燃性天然ガス開発に係る調査等を実施する事業(以下、「産油・産ガス国事業環境整備事業」という。)に要する経費を補助することにより、産油・産ガス国と我が国との関係を強化し、石油及び可燃性天然ガスの安定的かつ低廉な供給の確保を図ることを目的とする。」ものとします。(交付要綱から引用) ■応募資格 応募資格:次の要件を満たす民間団体等とします。 ※コンソーシアム形式による申請の場合は、幹事者を決めていただくとともに、幹事者が事業提案書を提出してください。(ただし、幹事者が業務の全てを他の者に再委託することはできません。)日本法人と現地法人の共同申請も可能です。(なお幹事法人及び共同申請者の要件については、以下をご確認ください)その場合の補助金は、幹事法人あるいは共同申請者(日本法人に限る)に交付し、幹事法人あるいは共同申請者(日本法人に限る)から現地法人に分配することとし、当該分配に係る手数料等は補助対象外とします。 (1)単独の申請、または、幹事法人の応募資格 ①日本に拠点を有していること。 ②本事業を的確に遂行する組織、人員等を有していること。 ③本事業を円滑に遂行するために必要な経営基盤を有し、かつ、資金等について十分な管理能力を有していること。 ④経済産業省からの補助金交付等停止措置又は指名停止措置が講じられている者ではないこと。 ⑤経済産業省におけるEBPM※に関する取組に協力すること。 (※)EBPM(Evidence-Based Policy Making:証拠に基づく政策立案)とは、政策の企画をその場限りのエピソードに頼るのではなく、政策目的を明確化したうえで合理的根拠(エビデンス)に基づくものとすることです。限られた予算・資源のもと、各種の統計を正確に分析して効果的な政策を選択していくEBPMの推進は、2017年以降毎年、政府の経済財政運営と改革の基本方針(骨太の方針)にも掲げられており、今後もますます重要性が増していくことが予想されます。 (2)共同申請する場合の幹事法人以外(以下、「共同申請者」)の応募資格 ①日本に拠点を有している、若しくは、現地法人の場合は、以下いずれかの要件を満たした法人であること。 (ⅰ)幹事法人あるいは共同申請者(日本法人に限る)の海外子会社(日本側出資比率10%以上) (ⅱ)幹事法人あるいは共同申請者(日本法人に限る)の海外孫会社(日本側出資比率50%超の海外子会社の出資比率50%超)。 ②本事業を的確に遂行する組織、人員等を有していること。 ③本事業を円滑に遂行するために必要な経営基盤を有し、かつ、資金等について十分な管理能力を有していること。 ④経済産業省からの補助金交付等停止措置又は指名停止措置が講じられている者ではないこと。 ⑤経済産業省におけるEBPMに関する取組に協力すること。 ※応募に当たって提出された申請書や関連書類に記載の事項に虚偽が認められたり、疑義が生じたりした場合は、採択後であっても、経済産業省はその内容について確認を行い、採択の取り消しを行う権利を留保しているものとします。 ■備考 採択予定件数:特に上限等は設けませんが、予算の範囲内での採択とします。 補助率・補助額:事業を実施するために直接必要な経費について、予算の範囲内で定額または2/3または1/2とします。 予算額は約29億円(令和8年度政府予算)です。なお、最終的な実施内容、交付決定額は、経済産業省と調整した上で決定することとします。 ■問合せ先 〒100-0004 東京都千代田区大手町1-9-2 大手町フィナンシャルシティグランキューブ 「資源権益・安定供給の確保に向けた資源国との関係強化支援事業」事務局 株式会社 野村総合研究所 E-mail: resource-interests-r8-oilgus-ext@nri.co.jp 〒100-8901 東京都千代田区霞が関1-3-1 経済産業省 資源エネルギー庁 資源・燃料部 資源開発課 担当:松尾、鳥原 E-mail: matsuo-yudai@meti.go.jp torihara-tomoya@meti.co.jp ■参照URL (NRI ニュース) https://www.nri.com/jp/news/public_offer/resource_subsidy_fy2026_3.html

Category
Startup Founding, R&D, Global Expansion, Facility, Talent
Industry
All industries
Technology
Needs verification
Target stage
Needs verification
Project duration
Needs verification
Estimated preparation
Needs verification

Funding

Award size and how it is paid

Award range
up to ¥2.9B
Currency
JPY
Total programme budget
Needs verification
Support type
Needs verification
Co-funding
Needs verification
Matching fund
Needs verification
Disbursement
Needs verification
Note
補助率 定額、2/3、1/2

Eligibility

Can we actually apply?

Check whether we can applyEnter where you are incorporated, how old you are and how big — we compare it against this announcement and tell you what would unlock it. No sign-in needed.

対象業種: 漁業 / 建設業 / 製造業 / 電気・ガス・熱供給・水道業 / 情報通信業 / 複合サービス事業 / サービス業(他に分類されないもの) / 公務(他に分類されるものを除く) / 分類不能の産業 / 農業、林業 / 鉱業、採石業、砂利採取業 / 運輸業、郵便業 / 卸売業、小売業 / 金融業、保険業 / 不動産業、物品賃貸業 / 学術研究、専門・技術サービス業 / 宿泊業、飲食サービス業 / 生活関連サービス業、娯楽業 / 教育、学習支援業 / 医療、福祉 / 従業員数: 従業員数の制約なし

Company age
Needs verification
Employees
Needs verification
Revenue limits
Needs verification
Consortium
Needs verification

Location Requirements

Geography and legal-entity conditions

Primary country
🇯🇵 Japan
Also eligible
None
Foreign companies
Needs verification
Local entity
Needs verification
Location condition
全国 소재 사업자를 대상으로 합니다(원문 확인 필요).

Required Documents

Required/optional · issuer · difficulty · validity · cautions

Document requirements were not captured (needs verification). Check the official announcement.

Application Process

How you apply

Application process not captured.

Evaluation

Review process and criteria

Evaluation process not captured.

Timeline

Announcement → intake → review → agreement → execution

Process steps were not captured.

Equity & Financial Terms

Equity, loans and contract conditions

Equity required
Needs verification
Loan
Non-dilutive grant
Duplicate funding
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Exclusivity
Needs verification
Right of first refusal
Needs verification
Audit & settlement
Needs verification

Risk Intelligence

Should we apply at all? — five dimensions plus an overall score (lower is safer)

Overall: Not assessable (insufficient data)
Eligibility risk33

Chance of failing eligibility, location or legal-entity rules

Financial risk20

Co-funding, matching funds, reimbursement and loan exposure

Execution risk40

Paperwork load, timeline pressure, reporting and audit duties

Contract risk27

Exclusivity, right of first refusal, duplicate-funding limits

IP & idea exposure riskNeeds verification

How much technical detail you must hand over, and who owns it

Key risk factors
  • 18
    Deadline very close

    There is little time left to prepare the documents.

  • 10
    Required documents not collected· evidence needs verification

    The list of required documents was not collected.

  • 8
    Local-entity requirement not stated· evidence needs verification

    The announcement does not say whether a local entity is required.

  • 8
    Payment timing not stated· evidence needs verification

    Advance versus reimbursement makes a large difference to cash flow.

  • 7
    Overseas eligibility not stated· evidence needs verification

    Whether an overseas company may take part has to be confirmed.

  • 7
    Exclusivity not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any exclusivity clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Right of first refusal not stated· evidence needs verification

    Any right-of-first-refusal clause has to be checked.

  • 6
    Duplicate-support rule not stated· evidence needs verification

    Whether parallel support is allowed has to be confirmed.

14 item(s) need verification
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a local entity is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an overseas company may apply is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a matching fund is required is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether payment is in advance or in arrears is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The level of settlement and audit obligation is not stated (needs verification).
  • · The duplicate-support rule is not stated (needs verification).

Generated by local:rules-v1 · 2d ago

IP / Idea Protection

How much of your technology and idea you must disclose

Required documents unknown

The announcement does not say what has to be submitted, so the disclosure exposure cannot be judged. the scope of the material requested is not stated. The awarding body is jGrants — 実施機関未確認. 8 fields could not be read and must be checked in the announcement and the grant agreement.

NDA
Needs verification
IP ownership
Needs verification
Deliverable ownership
Needs verification
Data rights
Needs verification
Disclosure depth
Needs verification
File patent first?
Not applicable
Reuse of submissions
Needs verification
Publicity obligation
Needs verification
Exposure score
Needs verification
Safe to disclose
  • · The problem your product solves, and the market definition
  • · Your value proposition and quantified results (improvement rates, throughput)
  • · Anything already public: granted patents, papers, press coverage
  • · Team composition, capabilities and a summary of past delivery
  • · Architecture-level diagrams at module granularity, without internal implementation
Keep to a minimum
  • · Core algorithms: formulae, hyper-parameters and pre-processing rules
  • · Raw training data and the details of your collection pipeline
  • · Full source code and build or deployment scripts
  • · Cost structure and unit-price formulae
  • · Named customers, contract terms and pricing
  • · How an unfiled invention is actually implemented
Recommended actions
  • MEDIUMRequest an NDA

    Ask in writing for a mutual NDA before submitting detailed technical material; if it is refused, keep what you submit at summary level.

4 evidence item(s) from the source
  • UNKNOWN

    No document list was collected, so the exposure of technical material cannot be judged.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    No NDA clause could be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    IP ownership terms could not be found.

    Source link
  • UNKNOWN

    Ownership of the deliverables terms could not be found.

    Source link
Needs verification (8)
  • · The list of required documents was not collected — check the announcement for what technical material must be submitted.
  • · Whether an NDA can be signed is not stated (needs verification).
  • · IP ownership terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · Ownership of the deliverables is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Data-rights terms are not stated (needs verification).
  • · How submitted material may be reused is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether an exclusivity clause applies is not stated (needs verification).
  • · Whether a right of first refusal applies is not stated (needs verification).

This assessment is derived from the stored announcement, document and contract fields. Anything the source does not state is marked "needs verification" — it never asserts that your idea will be taken. Generated by local:rules-v1 · 2d ago

AI Analysis

Pros · cons · difficulty · competition · attractiveness

Preparation difficultyNeeds verification

From paperwork and review stages

Competition (estimate)65

Heuristic from award size and type

Attractiveness72

Amount, terms and IP combined

Overall riskNeeds verification

Weighted average of five dimensions

Pros
  • Needs verification
Cons
  • Needs verification
Cautions
  • Nothing flagged

Similar Programs

Comparable by type, country and technology

Source & Provenance

Every value carries its source URL and fetch time

Last fetched
2026.09.15
Human review
Not reviewed — check the official announcement
First seen
2026.09.03
Data status
Auto-collected, not reviewed
AI enrichment
Needs verification
Sources (2)
Snapshot history
  • · 17d ago최초 수집 (43670c3e)